Archive for the ‘Articles’ Category

Dear clients and readers, We are proud to announce that we have recently won a new important administrative lawsuit case against the Spanish Administration Government. 

In a nutshell, our client, – an important pharmaceutical company based in Torrevieja,- was unduly accused of prescribing unlicensed Magisterial Prescriptions, and intended to impose them a fine of more than 30.000 euros. 

What is a magistral preparation?

First of all, I will start with a brief introduction to the various product categories. This term comes from the pharmaceutical sector, and it refers to medicines made by the chemist himself based on a prescription. It may be a very specific formula, a standardized recipe or a composition in which a medicinal product is processed. These preparations must be formulated in accordance with approved licences and regulations, depending on the specific kind of composition. 

The Judgment

The Court dismissed the claim brought against our client and 100% agreed with all the allegations made in our reply to the claim. Please see below an extract of the Judgment.

According to this decision, the Court has stated that in administrative matters, it has been repeatedly declared, – both by the jurisprudence of our highest Supreme Court and by that of the Constitutional Court, – that the principles that inspire Criminal Law are also applicable, – with certain nuances, – to administrative sanctioning law. From this perspective, the burden of proof always lies on the Administration. 
Therefore, the fundamental right to the presumption of innocence in the field of sanctioning administrative law presupposes, that no one can be held responsible for an administrative offense by virtue of evidence of charge obtained in an unconstitutionally legitimate manner (Decisions Constitutional Court TC 13 / 1.982, of April 1, 36 / 1.985, of March 8, 76 / 1.990, of April 26 and 3 / 1.999, of January 3, and S.T.C. 138/1990, among others).

This particular recent legal decision has a tremendous practical impact in those future cases for hundreds of other Spanish and EU private individuals or companies, who might have been unfairly fined by the government, either in any tax or any other administrative matter.  

100% Rate of Success Administrative Lawsuits

At BZN LEX INTERNATIONAL LAWYERS, we have a proven history of bringing successful actions or appeals against public authorities, and administrative bodies across the country, and we are proud to say that so far, we are winning all the Court cases against the local administrations and public authorities in general.

How to contact us?

We hope this information is useful. Should you be interested in receiving more specific advice and information, (either about this particular subject or any other), you can contact our firm several ways:

1. Call us or send us a WhatsApp now to (0034) 687 88 88 73.

2. You can also use our e-mail form at the top of the sidebar of your screen, or alternatively, you can send us e-mail to info@bestsolicitorsinspain.com

Our commitment, we’ll respond to your e-mail inquiry in less than 24 hours.

We are on social media.  Follow us on:

A) Facebook: BZN Lex International Lawyers@oscarricormorales7

b)  twitter: https://twitter.com/BznLex

c)  and linkedin.com/in/ricorabogados

Finally, thank you very much for your attention, and in case you might have any question or doubt at all about our new case won, again please do not hesitate to contact us and we will be glad to clarify at your earliest convenience.

We look forward to helping you and the benefit of our “know-how”.

Kindest regards

Mr Oscar Ricor

 “NON-PRACTISING ENGLISH SOLICITOR IN ENGLAND AND WALES”, under the “Solicitors Regulation Authority” (SRA) SRA number 519196 and practising Spanish Solicitor.

NEW CASE WON
NEW CASE WON

La entrada NEW CASE WON AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT se publicó primero en BZN LEX INTERNATIONAL LAWYERS.

MORTGAGE COSTS. CLAIM YOUR RIGHTS!

EXCELLENT NEWS FOR CONSUMERS:
THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE FORCES SPANISH BANKS TO REFUND ALL ABUSIVE MORTGAGE COSTS IN FULL. REMEMBER: NOW IS THE TIME TO REVIEW YOUR MORTGAGE AND CLAIM WHAT IS YOURS!

Dear readers, 

The Court of Justice of the European Union -CJEU- has declared in a judgment handed down on July 16; that if the abusive clause that charges the client with the payment of all the expenses of the constitution; and cancellation of a mortgage is declared null and void; the bank must proceed to the full refund of the amounts unduly paid by the consumer.

What does exactly the CJEU Judgment say?

According to analysts, this new ruling of the CJEU; would allow about 8 million clients to claim and recover all the expenses of setting up the mortgage; (Notary, Property Registry and Management & gestor) provided that a judge declares the nullity of the mortgage clause.

The above-mentioned Judgment has come to answer the preliminary ruling that had been raised, both by the Court of First Instance No. 17 of Palma de Mallorca and by the Court of First Instance and Instruction of Ceuta; which has been a new setback to the jurisprudence of our Supreme Court in this matter; which unfairly ruled that the notary and gestor’s fees derived from the mortgage loan, should be divided 50% each.

However, the CJEU has indicated that this distribution of expenses; would only be admissible in the unlikely event that the provisions of national law applicable in the absence of the clause declared void; might precisely impose on the consumer, the payment of all or part of these mortgage costs; which in practice it never happens.

Thus, it is considered contrary to Union law, – specifically to Directive 93/13; – that the national court can modify the content of a clause declared abusive, and as a consequence, once declared its nullity; the bank will have to reimburse all of the expenses and not just 50%

Opening commission of the Mortgage

Likewise, in relation to the opening commission, the CJEU has again corrected the Supreme Court; leaving open the possibility for the consumer to claim their amount as well.

Therefore, unlike what the Supreme Court pointed out, it is not sufficient that the opening commission appears in the mortgage contract to consider it valid. On the contrary, the clause must have a “clear and understandable wording”, which cannot be reduced to a merely formal or grammatical level; Rather, this requirement must be understood in an extensive manner; given the comprehensive consumer protection that Directive 93/13 grants to the consumer, who is always in a situation of inferiority.

That is, the clause must transparently explain the specific purpose and mechanism of the opening commission clause within the contract; so that the consumer is fully aware of the reasons that justify the fees corresponding to this commission.

Limitation period and the deadline to claim the refund of these amounts

The CJEU has been favourable to the application of the five-year limitation period with regard to the refund of the amounts unduly paid; However, it has declared that the five-year period begins to run from the conclusion of the mortgage loan contract; and not when the mortgage was granted. 

Procedural aspects and costs

Finally, the CJEU has resolved in relation to the attribution of the costs; that if the consumer is finally forced to go to the Courts to obtain the declaration of nullity of the abusive clauses; due to the refusal of the bank to reach an out of court settlement; full costs will be imposed on the bank.

This is excellent news because until now, the court had the discretion not to impose costs on any of the parties; which in practice was a deterrent for many consumers to exercise their rights conferred on them by Directive 93/13, and obtain an effective redress. 

100% RATE OF SUCCESS SO FAR

The good news is that we are winning all the Court cases against banks, and we are currently preparing new lawsuits on behalf of an increasing number of foreign people affected; so we are very confident about their outcome as well. Remember, that even if you might be national from another country, you have granted with the same rights as a Spanish consumer!

Likewise, the bank will still face liability, even if the mortgage might have been already cancelled within the limitation period of the action.

HOW TO CONTACT US FOR FURTHER SPECIFIC ADVICE?

We hope this information is useful. Remember that this article is not intended to be specific legal advice, just a general overview. Should you be interested in receiving more specific information; (either about this particular mortgage subject or any other matter), you can contact our firm in several ways:

1. Call us or send us a WhatsApp now to (0034) 687 88 88 73.

2. You can also use our e-mail form at the top of the sidebar of your screen, or alternatively, you can send us e-mail to info@bestsolicitorsinspain.com

Our commitment, we’ll respond to your e-mail inquiry in less than 24 hours.

We are on social media.  Follow us on:

A) facebook: BZN Lex International Lawyers@oscarricormorales7

b)  twitter: https://twitter.com/BznLex

c)  and linkedin.com/in/ricorabogados

Finally, thank you very much for your attention, and in case you might have any question or doubt at all about how to claim your mortgage costs, again please do not hesitate to contact us. We will be glad to help you!

We look forward to helping you and the benefit of our “know-how”.

Kindest regards
Mr Oscar Ricor
 “NON-PRACTISING ENGLISH SOLICITOR IN ENGLAND AND WALES”, under the “Solicitors Regulation Authority” (SRA) SRA number 519196 and practising Spanish Solicitor.

MORTGAGE COSTS

La entrada MORTGAGE COSTS. se publicó primero en BZN LEX INTERNATIONAL LAWYERS.

WE HAVE SAVED OUR CLIENT FROM A PROPERTY FRAUD

Dear friends, clients and readers,

 As the summer holiday season is upon us, and after a very busy year helping clients, I must say that one of the true privileges of working as a Solicitor, is to receive testimonials like the one below, which fills me with a lot of professional pride and sincere gratitude. Please see the link of the publication_ https://business.google.com/reviews/l/17814524492651086608?hl=en-GB

Finally, I would like-if we may- to take this opportunity once more to thank you and wish you all, – despite the dreadful COVID-19,- a peaceful summer break. We sincerely look forward to keep helping you in the years to come.

Stay safe!

Mr. Oscar Ricor Morales.

“NON-PRACTISING ENGLISH SOLICITOR IN ENGLAND AND WALES”, under the “Solicitors Regulation Authority” (SRA) SRA number 519196 and practicing Spanish Solicitor under the “Colegio de Abogados de Orihuela”.

Real review recently received related to a property conveyancing process:

“Hola Oscar,I just wanted to express my thanks, once again, for helping us avoid a huge mistake. You acted with great decorum and diligence, we will not forget this. As promised, please see the review I posted online tonight in praise of you and your company. You live up to you core values when so many fail to do so. I wish you, your family and your firm all the very best for the future!

PS, I always use a pseudonym for online reviews which is Tom Sawyer, I just wanted you to know it was me!

Hasta luego, Tony Regan

TESTIMONIAL:

Tom Sawyer Oscar is an extremely knowledgeable and meticulous lawyer, he is very client-focused and ensures your interests are always well protected. If you require a lawyer who is fluent in English, in both written and verbal forms, Oscar would be an excellent choice. Oscar provides an outstanding service at a very reasonable cost, his advice was invaluable to my wife and I and helped us avoid a catastrophe. Many thanks for your kind and professional assistance Oscar, we will return to you again when needed. Saludos!”

PROPERTY FRAUD

La entrada PROPERTY FRAUD se publicó primero en BZN LEX INTERNATIONAL LAWYERS.

Are you ready for the end of the transition period?

We are glad to inform all our clients and readers that in accordance to Instruction of 2nd July 2020; a new procedure for issuing the residence permit for citizens of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland nationals has been put in place.

In fact, the new TIE regulation simplifies the process greatly for nationals from the United Kingdom (as well as their family members and any other persons residing in Spain); who will be entitled to receive a residence document, expressly indicating their status, as a beneficiary of the withdrawal Agreement. 

For those who already hold the residency certificate, you will not be obliged to exchange it; although according to our experience with other clients, the exchange process is fairly quick and simple. 

On the contrary, for those who are submitting the application for the first time; the requirements (in particular the financial criteria) will vary depending on your personal status (i.e single, married, children); employee of a company, business entrepreneur ( i.e “self-employed or “autonomo”, company shareholder…), pensioner, etc

Remember that time is of the essence, as the transitional period will last, until 31 December 2020; so for those applying for the first time; you will need a minimum of 3 months to prepare all the required certificates from the bank and the Spanish authorities.

For more specific information or advice about this important topic; please do not hesitate to contact us directly and we will be delighted to point you in the right direction.

Thank you very much for your attention and we look forward to helping you. 

Mr Oscar Ricor “NON-PRACTISING ENGLISH SOLICITOR IN ENGLAND AND WALES”, under the “Solicitors Regulation Authority” (SRA) SRA number 519196 and practising Spanish Solicitor. BZN LEX INTERNATIONAL LAWYERS

NEW RESIDENCY PROCESS TIE

La entrada NEW RESIDENCY PROCESS TIE se publicó primero en BZN LEX INTERNATIONAL LAWYERS.

ANOTHER CASE WON!

OUR CLIENT SAVES THE HOUSE! The Court rules on the consequences of invalid accelerated repayment clauses in mortgages and declares the dismissal of the mortgage enforcement proceedings.

On 11 September 2019, the Spanish Supreme Court delivered a landmark judgment resolving one of the most disputed issues relating to mortgage loans in Spain. The question was regarding the consequences when clauses that allow lenders to accelerate loans upon failure to pay just one or more instalments are declared unfair and, consequently, null and void under Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts. This issue has, in fact, a serious impact on the way mortgage loans have been unduly enforced by many Spanish Banks over the past few years.

Consequently, our client was also sued by the bank, but after a fierce battle in Court, we have managed to declare the enforcement process and the mortgage null and void, which in practical terms, means that our client has been able to save the house. We enclose below photograph of the Judgment for your perusal.

Finally, please see below the kind testimonial just received from our client when she heard the news (both in its original Spanish version and its translation into English):

Buenos días Oscar;

Leí su correo este fin de semana. – Ni qué decirle como me encuentro. – No lo esperaba con tanta rapidez. No puedo describir con estas letras cuál es mi estado de ánimo. – Son ustedes unos grandes profesionales. Gracias, gracias y gracias. –  

Sin más y con mi profundo agradecimiento reciban un saludo afectuoso.  Mrs M.Diez (Alicante. Spain)

English version: “Good morning Oscar;

I have read your email this weekend. – Needless to say, how grateful I am.- I did not expect it so quickly. I cannot describe in this letter what my state of mind is. – You are great professionals. Thank you, thank you and thank you. – Please accept my deep gratitude and a warm greeting. Mrs M.Diez (Alicante. Spain)

Reviews like this one I got today make all the hard work and effort we put in winning the case worth it!

ANOTHER CASE WON

Remember, this is not just another case won, as litigators Solicitors, we are proficient in dealing with all kind of lawsuits against banks, so If you need solicitors who go that extra mile and will guide you every step of the way then please do not hesitate to contact our Firm, and we will be delighted to help you.

Kindest regards

Mr Oscar Ricor

“NON-PRACTISING ENGLISH SOLICITOR IN ENGLAND AND WALES”, under the “Solicitors Regulation Authority” (SRA) SRA number 519196 and practicing Spanish Solicitor.

Please see below last page of the Court’s decision:

ANOTHER CASE WON

La entrada ANOTHER CASE WON! se publicó primero en BZN LEX INTERNATIONAL LAWYERS.

IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT: BZN LEX International Lawyers

To all our clients, and readers

I hope you are all keeping well and safe.

We are glad to inform you that we have re-opened our offices from 11th May. Please see below some essential recommendations:

First, please bear in mind that it is mandatory for you to wear a mask before entering the office. All BZN LEX staff will do exactly the same as well.

Second, likewise, there will be a desk outside with disinfectant gel for you to use on your hands before entering.

Third, for your peace of mind, it is very important to book your face to face appointment with sufficient notice, as we can only attend to one client at a time.

Finally, regarding the Annual Tax Returns,- or any other urgent legal matter to discuss, – we recommend our clients to preferably email us all the relevant information or paperwork by e-mail or WhatsApp system in advance.

That measure is not only devised for your safety but also in order to be able to have a look at all the documents related to the case and consequently prepare better the meeting in advance.

Please rest assured that, we have prepared our office meticulously for reopening so that we can attend to you safely and in accordance with the current government guidelines.

To make an appointment:
Call 0034. 687 88 88 73 Email: info@bestsolicitorsinspain.com Finally, we will be delighted to arrange a videoconference at your best convenience, in case you might need it.

We look forward to seeing you all soon.

Stay safe!

Best regards

Mr. Oscar Ricor, PARTNER

“NON-PRACTISING ENGLISH SOLICITOR IN ENGLAND AND WALES”, under the “Solicitors Regulation Authority” (SRA) SRA number 519196 and practicing Spanish Solicitor.

BZN LEX INTERNATIONAL LAWYERS (FORMER RICOR ABOGADOS)

REOPENING OFFICES

La entrada REOPENING OFFICES se publicó primero en BZN LEX INTERNATIONAL LAWYERS.

ADMINISTRATIVE CLAIMS COVID 19: ON THE ILLEGALITY OF THE SANCTIONS IMPOSED DURING THE STATE OF ALARM

ADMINISTRATIVE CLAIMS COVID
  1. SPAIN’S CORONAVIRUS LOCKDOWN AND THEIR ASSOCIATED FINES ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND UNLAWFUL

More than 15,000 people have been fined so far by the National Police and Guardia Civil for non-compliance with the coronavirus lockdown rules. However, our courts are already at saturation point, and there is a growing concern about their legality. Consequently, the government risks several years of appeals and legal chaos.

The necessary question that we need to ask ourselves is this; Are the lockdown and the fines for its infringement lawful?

In order to answer this question. We need to analyse if the regulation of the state of alarm; implemented by the Spanish government complies with the Rule of Law.

In the first place, the Spanish Constitution stipulates that restrictions on individual rights and freedoms must always be proportional to the threat.

We all agree at this point that a virus epidemic is a threat that is difficult; to control and thus justifies the use of extraordinary constitutional measures and introduction of additional restrictions on human rights and freedoms.

Therefore, these additional restrictions resulting from an extraordinary situation; – as the COVID-19 epidemic, – can be authorised expressly in the constitution, by way of declaring the state of alarm.

However, due to the fact that this extraordinary situation gives the government greater “liberties”; – the restrictions imposed by the state of alarm must always be within the confines of the rule of law; – in order to achieve its sole objective and seek to bring the epidemic under control. In other words, the state of alarm can never be used as an excuse in order to implement a dubious political agenda.

In the second place, the Royal Decree establishing the State of alarm does not set a table of sanctions, but refers (art. 20) to the Organic Law governing the lockdown and hence, in a generic way to “the laws.”

The consequence as we will see are gargantuan.

According to the doctrine of the “Everything which is not forbidden is allowed” is a constitutional principle found in the English common law. (In international law, it is known as the Lotus principle).

This principle has always acted as a safeguard against totalitarian regimes; for the actions of the public authorities are limited to the powers explicitly granted to them by the Law and the Constitution.

In other words, one of the obligations of public authorities is to protect the safety of citizens. However, the actions of all institutions of a democratic state should be founded on and limited by the law. This principle is clearly set out by the Spanish constitution.

The converse principle—”everything which is not allowed is forbidden” is exactly the opposite; that is a totalitarian principle devised by the infamous so-called jurist Kelsen, who, – inspired by this principle; – gave the perfect justification and the legal frame to the Nazi regime, as to commit all the atrocities.

By applying this analogy to the situation in Spain; we can immediately detect how the Royal Decree of state of alarm 463/2020 precisely applies this evil principle; as it does not contain a table or list of types of offences, but a general prohibition, with some permissions allowed.

In other words; “everything which is not allowed by the Decree nº 463/2020 is forbidden”.

The decree is deficiently drafted and exceptions to confinement are very vague, poorly defined; and force members of the Security Forces to set subjective criteria for gargantuan sanctions; which are often confused with the obligations that correspond to citizens.

The result is that public authorities have therefore taken “liberties” in an unconstitutional; and thus unlawful manner, which creates the risk of abuses from the police.

Our Fundamental civil rights have been significantly restricted: the possibility of leaving home, an unjustified ban on religious gatherings, a prohibition on entering forests; parks, etc despite the lack of legal foundations for their implementation.

Leading jurists have pointed to evident violations of the constitution regarding freedom of movement; freedom of assembly, the inviolability of the home, freedom to conduct business, and personal property and security.

One example of this dysfunctional law-making is that person for example; who wanders alone onto a green space may be even denounced for resistance and disobedience, -which is a criminal offence, – and be put in jail.

Or for example, the case of a person fined 600 euros for buying in a supermarket; which location wasn’t the nearest to his place, or the other case of a man fined for buying an “inessential” product will go down in history.

This situation is totally outrageous and it does not comply with the standards of a democratic state.

This far-reaching and non-justified restriction of all the civil liberties and human rights is mandatory not only for people who are ill or suspected to be infected; but to the entire population, who are being subjected to such a disproportionate and gargantuan sanctioning regime.

The anti-coronavirus restrictions are not just prohibitions and limitations, but also significant punishments for breaking the regulations. There is no legal basis for repressing citizens with such extraordinary sanctions. For this reason, too, the currently binding financial and criminal penalties are neither proportional; nor rational, and not necessary in the light of the standards of the constitution, and the Rule of Law.

2. ILLEGAL ENFORCEMENT OF THE SANTIONS

The unlawful procedure followed for imposing the sanctions administered during the state of epidemic makes them also unconstitutional.

Those who drew up the regulations chose not to sanction violations of the lockdown using the classical path foreseen by administrative law, which gives citizens the right to a fair trial.

The fines are imposed by an official, often without evidence proceedings. Although citizens have the right to an appeal, this does not delay the punishment – fines are immediately enforceable.

3. IS IT POSSIBLE TO APPEAL THE FINES IN COURT?

The imposition of fines does not prevent citizens from exercising their rights before a court, so anyone who feels they have been fined unfairly, can go to the administrative court to contest it.

It is to be hoped that in prevision of the avalanche of thousands of claims, all this will be decided by an impartial and independent court, and the “floodgates principle” will not be applied. But this is not certain, considering that the actions of the political authorities in Spain,- before and during,- the coronavirus epidemic have sought to bring independent judges and courts under their control.

Therefore, it is not unlikely to think that some of these lawsuits and sanctions will end up being discussed not only in the contentious jurisdiction and the Constitutional Court in Spain, but possibly in the European Court of Human Rights.

III. CONCLUSION

From this long exegesis of the Decree of Alarm, we can draw the following conclusions:

1º) Spanish citizens live in a democracy, and not in an authoritarian regime. We cannot be coerced, harassed, or intimidated, with the excuse of a health crisis, no matter how serious this threat can be.

2º) Sanctions imposed during the State of Alarm are null and void; as they contravene the following laws and principles of law:

a. Art.47.2 of Law 39/2015, of October 1; “Of the common administrative procedure of the Public Administrations“, “the acts of the Public Administrations that violate the Laws, or the Constitution …”

b. Art. 17 Spanish Constitution (CE); “everyone has the right to liberty and security”; and article 103.1 CE (“The Public Administration objectively serves the general interests and acts with full submission to the Law”).

c. The principles of legal certainty, legality, and typicity.


3º) Consequently, sanctions can be appealed through the administrative Courts in Spain and before the European Courts.

To sum up, it is a fact that the coronavirus restrictions have seriously destabilised our legal system. We sincerely hope that once that the virus threat is defeated, we will not have to face a much more serious threat, this time to the rule of law. Otherwise, the risk of legal chaos that awaits us will be difficult to fathom.

Despite the fact that our offices will remain closed during this COVID 19 period, we will always be kept a direct contact as always by email, phone (0034. 687 88 88 73 y info@bestsolicitorsinspain.com)

And also, we will be delighted to arrange a videoconference in case you might need it.

Finally, during this moment of crisis, I would like- if I may- to kindly give a message of encouragement and hope, especially to our elderly, who are the most vulnerable in this terrible crisis.

Please Stay safe!

Mr. Oscar Ricor, PARTNER

NON-PRACTISING ENGLISH SOLICITOR IN ENGLAND AND WALES”, under the “Solicitors Regulation Authority” (SRA) SRA number 519196 and practising Spanish Solicitor.

La entrada ADMINISTRATIVE CLAIMS COVID 19 se publicó primero en BZN LEX INTERNATIONAL LAWYERS.

“SOBRE LA LEGALIDAD DEL CONFINAMIENTO DOMICILIARIO OBLIGATORIO PARA PERSONAS SANAS DURANTE EL ESTADO DE ALARMA”

Y
“SOBRE LA LEGALIDAD DE LAS SANCIONES ADMINISTRATIVAS EN EL ESTADO DE ALARMA 

Resumen

Estimados lectores y clientes,

El acervo popular no está familiarizado con los estados de alarma; no son algo común ni habitual, y su excepcionalidad abunda aún más en su desconocimiento.

Por su parte, el mundo jurídico da por hecho – con demasiada temeridad, creemos – que el Gobierno respetará las leyes y las cumplirá punto por punto; en una confianza que, utilizando una frase extraída de la doctrina jurisprudencial, viene a resultar de un “optimismo temerario”.

Pues bien, tanto al ciudadano medio, como al versado en Derecho, les ha venido a sorprender la aplicación por parte del Gobierno de las medidas de confinamiento domiciliario, y la aplicación de un régimen de sanciones por su quebrantamiento, que parecían ser “normales y justificadas” porque “todos los países las estaban aplicando”.

Este dictamen viene a demostrar que todo ello es falso; que es una ilusión óptica, y que detrás de tales medidas, solo subyace la ilegalidad, y una perversa y bastarda destrucción de nuestro sistema de derechos y de libertades individuales, sacrificados en el altar del bien común, utilizando la pandemia como excusa.

Si está interesado en acceder al contenido íntegro del Dictamen, lo tiene a su disposición a través de las siguientes vías:

  1. Puede leerlo en la sección “doctrinas y consultas” de la Revista-Editorial jurídica SEPIN, quien ha tenido la gentileza de publicar nuestro Dictamen.
  • Alternativamente, puede solicitárnoslo directamente contactando con nuestro Bufete, a través del formulario de contacto indicado en nuestra web.

Finalmente, esperamos que el Dictamen sea de su interés y agrado, y no dude ponerse en contacto con nosotros, si tuviera algún tipo de duda o cuestión sobre el mismo. Estaremos gustosos de atenderle.

Saludos cordiales

D. Oscar Ricor

Abogado

DICTAMEN ESTADO

La entrada DICTAMEN ESTADO ALARMA COVID-19 se publicó primero en BZN LEX INTERNATIONAL LAWYERS.

Chers Clients, Chers Confrères,

Suite aux recommandations du gouvernement liées à l’épidémie de Covid-19, et dans un souci de santé publique, nous vous informons que l’ensemble de notre Cabinet est désormais en télétravail.

Les juridictions sont fermées sauf cas très particuliers (notamment urgence) et les études d’huissier ne procèdent également à la signification d’actes ou l’établissement de PV de constat qu’en cas d’urgence.

Pour autant, nous demeurons toujours à vos côtés et avons mis tout en œuvre afin d’assurer la continuité de notre activité.

Jusqu’à nouvel ordre, nous privilégierons les contacts par mail, téléphone ou Visio conférence. (0034 687 88 88 73)

Notre système informatique nous permet déjà de vous garantir la totale confidentialité de nos échanges, et d’organiser des conférences téléphoniques pour remplacer les réunions physiques.
 
Le travail à distance fait partie de notre quotidien d’avocat. Dès lors, les mesures prises par le gouvernement n’auront aucun impact sur la gestion de vos dossiers. Soyez assurés que nous continuons à travailler à vos côtés pour assurer la défense de vos intérêts et celle de vos entreprises.
Nos équipes restent mobilisées et nous sommes personnellement toujours à votre écoute.

Vous pouvez également joindre chacun d’entre nous sans difficulté par email, et à défaut sur l’adresse info@bestsolicitorsinspain.com , et nous vous rappellerons sans délai.

Très cordialement,

M. Oscar Ricor

Avocat

Comunicado COVID 19

La entrada COVID 19 – Le Cabinet BZN LEX est à vos côtés se publicó primero en BZN LEX INTERNATIONAL LAWYERS.

Chers Clients, Chers Confrères,

Suite aux recommandations du gouvernement liées à l’épidémie de Covid-19, et dans un souci de santé publique, nous vous informons que l’ensemble de notre Cabinet est désormais en télétravail.

Les juridictions sont fermées sauf cas très particuliers (notamment urgence) et les études d’huissier ne procèdent également à la signification d’actes ou l’établissement de PV de constat qu’en cas d’urgence.

Pour autant, nous demeurons toujours à vos côtés et avons mis tout en œuvre afin d’assurer la continuité de notre activité.

Jusqu’à nouvel ordre, nous privilégierons les contacts par mail, téléphone ou Visio conférence. (0034 687 88 88 73)

Notre système informatique nous permet déjà de vous garantir la totale confidentialité de nos échanges, et d’organiser des conférences téléphoniques pour remplacer les réunions physiques.
 
Le travail à distance fait partie de notre quotidien d’avocat. Dès lors, les mesures prises par le gouvernement n’auront aucun impact sur la gestion de vos dossiers. Soyez assurés que nous continuons à travailler à vos côtés pour assurer la défense de vos intérêts et celle de vos entreprises.
Nos équipes restent mobilisées et nous sommes personnellement toujours à votre écoute.

Vous pouvez également joindre chacun d’entre nous sans difficulté par email, et à défaut sur l’adresse info@bestsolicitorsinspain.com , et nous vous rappellerons sans délai.

Très cordialement,

M. Oscar Ricor

Avocat

Comunicado COVID 19

La entrada COVID 19 – Le Cabinet BZN LEX est à vos côtés se publicó primero en BZN LEX INTERNATIONAL LAWYERS.


Proud to be members of London Chamber of Commerce
MadBlackCat